The best HARO tools in 2026
HARO sends about 43 journalist requests a day, and around 17% of them close within 24 hours. A HARO tool earns its money on three jobs: watching that feed, filtering it down to your genuine fits, and getting your reply out fast. Five options compared below, ours first and marked, with prices checked on 9 November 2026.
What a HARO tool has to do
- Monitor: catch every edition as it lands, not at your next inbox check.
- Filter: judge fit against your specific expertise. On a typical day, a handful of the 43 requests are yours; the tool's job is knowing which handful.
- Draft: turn your expertise into a sendable reply quickly, because a sixth of the feed closes inside a day.
Most products calling themselves HARO tools only monitor. Judge everything below against all three jobs.
The five options at a glance
| Option | Monitors | Filters by fit | Drafts replies | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QuotedExpert (ours) | Yes, 4 sources | Yes, scored to your expertise | Yes, from your words | $47/mo |
| HARO + inbox filters | You do, 3x daily | Keyword filters only | No | Free |
| Featured | Yes, plus other formats | Profile matching in platform | Yes, via chat and workflows | Free to $299/mo |
| Source of Sources | One daily email | Vetted feed, you judge fit | No | Free |
| Qwoted | Separate feed, not HARO | No, you browse | No | $99/mo billed annually |
1. QuotedExpert: the HARO tool built for experts (ours)
QuotedExpert processes the HARO feed the moment each edition lands, and does the same for Featured, Qwoted and Source of Sources. Every request is scored against the expertise and core offering you described at signup.
Matches arrive by email with deadlines and a draft written from your spoken or typed answer. You review, send from your own address, and your feedback on each match retrains the scoring.
Price: free to browse, $47/mo to respond, no caps. Pick it if HARO works for you but the daily reading does not. Skip it if you enjoy the raw feed or your niche is so unusual that you want eyes on everything personally.
2. HARO itself, with inbox filters: the free DIY setup
The zero-cost toolkit is HARO's own emails plus discipline: category subscriptions, keyword filters that label likely fits, and a template document for your credential line. It genuinely works, and plenty of quoted experts run exactly this.
Price: free, at 6 to 10 hours a month of your reading. Pick it if you are validating the channel. Skip it if the scan keeps losing to your actual job. We costed this properly in QuotedExpert vs doing HARO yourself.
3. Featured: HARO inside a bigger machine
Featured aggregates HARO requests alongside LinkedIn and other channels, then adds podcasts, speaking, awards and bylines. Its chat and scheduled workflows can monitor and draft for you, metered by a daily AI usage pool.
Price: free with a small daily allowance, then $39 to $299/mo by usage. Pick it if you want every format, not just quotes. Skip it if quote requests are the whole goal and a usage meter sounds like homework. Detail in Featured, in numbers.
4. Source of Sources: the companion feed
Not a HARO tool exactly, but the feed most HARO users should add. HARO's founder rebuilt the idea as one free, vetted daily email: about 12 requests a day, deadlines around four days, in our processing data.
Price: free. Pick it if you want a second, quieter request source alongside HARO. Skip it if one more daily email is the problem you are solving. Detail in Source of Sources, in numbers.
5. Qwoted: the professional's separate feed
Qwoted does not carry HARO requests; it runs its own curated feed with an expert database and pitch analytics. People searching for HARO tools often mean request tools generally, and this is the one built for professionals.
Price: free for 2 pitches a month, Pro at $99/mo billed annually for 35. Pick it if pitching is your occupation. Skip it if caps and in-platform pitching ration the way you work. Detail in Qwoted, in numbers.
How to choose
- Budget is the constraint: HARO plus inbox filters, and add Source of Sources. Revisit when your hour gets expensive.
- Time is the constraint: a matching tool. That is the entire reason QuotedExpert exists.
- Ambition is bigger than quotes: Featured, for podcasts, stages and awards in the same workflow.
- Pitching is the day job: Qwoted, and treat the others as supplementary feeds.
Common questions
- What is a HARO tool?
- Software that helps you work HARO's journalist request feed faster. The useful ones do some combination of three jobs: monitoring the feed so you do not have to, filtering roughly 43 daily requests down to the ones that fit your expertise, and helping you draft a reply before the deadline. Anything that only does the first job is an alert service, not a workflow.
- What is the best HARO tool?
- For an individual expert, QuotedExpert: it monitors HARO plus Featured, Qwoted and Source of Sources, scores every request against your expertise and drafts your reply for $47/mo. For zero budget, HARO's own emails with strict inbox filters are the honest free answer. For every-format visibility including podcasts and speaking, Featured is the broader tool.
- Is there software that monitors HARO for you?
- Yes. QuotedExpert processes the HARO feed as each edition lands and emails you only the requests scored as genuine fits, each with its deadline. Featured also aggregates HARO requests into its platform. What neither HARO itself nor simple alert tools do is judge fit against your specific expertise; that judgement is the difference between monitoring and matching.
- Can AI write my HARO pitches?
- It can draft them, and the distinction matters. Tools that generate pitches from nothing produce fluent, generic answers journalists delete on sight. The working model is yours first: you supply the expertise as a spoken or typed answer, and the tool shapes it into a journalist-ready reply. Your knowledge, its formatting.
- How much time does a HARO tool save?
- Reading HARO's three daily editions properly takes most people 15 to 30 minutes a day, roughly 6 to 10 hours a month, before writing a single pitch. A matching tool reduces the reading to a few minutes a week of reviewing matches and drafts. The writing shrinks too, because the draft starts from your answer rather than a blank email.
Last updated 9 November 2026, by the QuotedExpert team in London. Volumes and deadlines from our own processing of these feeds; prices checked on vendor sites the same day. Nobody paid for placement.
Comparing tools for PR more broadly? See the best PR tools by job and price →